51 pages 1 hour read

Miriam Toews

Women Talking

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Violent and Repressive Nature of Patriarchy

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussions and depictions of domestic and sexual violence.

When the women gather in Women Talking, they are deciding what action to take in response to the unspeakable violence they have suffered. They have been not only been regularly and viciously attacked as they sleep but also silenced by the perpetrators and their allies, either explicitly or complicitly. This violence and repression are a result of a toxic patriarchy: a society in which men have complete control over women.

Salome, in an impassioned speech, describes the world in which the women live:

We’re not members! she repeats. We are the women of Molotschna. The entire colony of Molotschna is built on the foundation of patriarchy […] where the women live out their days as mute, submissive and obedient servants. Animals. Fourteen-year-old boys are expected to give us orders, to determine our fates, to vote on our excommunications, to speak at the burials of our own babies while we remain silent, to interpret the Bible for us, to lead us in worship, to punish us! We are not members, Mariche, we are commodities (120-21).

This patriarchal society, with Peters at its head, creates a world wherein the women are subjugated and men control their lives. Their society not only denies them any kind of political voice or power but cuts off their access to such things at the root: They cannot read, so they cannot “interpret” the Bible, which is the source of ultimate authority in their religious colony.

Salome’s remark about punishment makes it clear that the sexual abuse the women have experienced is not a fluke but a feature of a system that keeps women in line with violence when ideological control fails. Evidence of this violence is clear in the descriptions of the characters: Mariche is missing half a finger, Nettie/Melvin has ceased talking and “no longer wants to be a woman” (46), Salome’s three-year-old daughter Miep has a sexually transmitted disease, Mejal experiences regular seizures, and Greta wears ill-fitting false teeth after having hers knocked out during an attack. No women in the colony have been spared brutality. When Mariche’s husband returns, he beats Mariche and hits his daughter, Autje, when she intervenes. The nonchalance with which the characters accept this violence illustrates just how widespread and normalized it is.

Despite the obvious atmosphere of abuse, the men of the colony deny the violence is taking place, allowing it to grow and fester. Bishop Peters, the “spiritual” and political leader of the colony, attributes the attacks to ghosts, the devil, or acts of “wild female imagination” (57). It is only when one of the attackers is caught in the act that the brutal attacks are recognized. Even then, Peters intends to handle the abuse internally, only seeking outside help when the victims of violence respond in kind: Salome attacks the men with a scythe, and Peters removes the men from the colony for their own protection, underscoring that violence is seen as legitimate only when wielded to subjugate the colony’s women. The denial and gaslighting damage the women beyond the physical attacks, eating away at their ability to trust themselves and each other.

Early in the deliberations, Mariche points out Peters’s mandate and the consequences the women are facing: “We will be forced to leave the colony, she says, if we don’t forgive the men and/or accept their apologies, and through the process of this excommunication we will forfeit our place in heaven” (24). Peters’s threat forces the women to either repress their anger and forgive the violence or leave everything they know. The power they claim by the end of the novel necessarily involves defying the patriarchal constraints of the colony and setting out with their children, determined to create a society where they can exercise choice and agency and raise their children in a more egalitarian environment.

The Healing Power of Community and Communication

The story arc of Women Talking relies completely on conversations among the women of Molotschna Colony. These women have been silenced their entire lives until violence, patriarchal control, and self-preservation force them to clandestinely meet in the hayloft of a run-down barn. There, they find power and freedom as they come together and open their hearts and minds with each other.

As their meetings begin, many of the women treat each other with animosity and distrust. They come from two of the colony’s prominent families, and while there is not a feud between the two families—the two elders have strong respect and affection for each other—the adult women regularly argue with and sometimes lash out at each other. Mariche and Salome especially are both strong, opinionated, and outspoken women, and they each represent the choice their family prefers: “The Friesen women, predominantly, want to stay and fight. The Loewens prefer to leave” (6). However, neither woman is accustomed to really communicating with others, as their patriarchal society has forbidden or forced underground true communication and community among the women. The representatives of the older generation, Greta and Agata, have clearly found ways to cooperate with each other despite these limitations: “[T]he meetings have been organized hastily by Agata Friesen and Greta Loewen” (4). Similarly, the two youngest members at the meetings share the close bond teenage girls often find, frequently acting in unison. However, the women who have households and children to protect and care for mistrust each other and show no such connection or closeness. Instead, their initial interactions are contentious and argumentative. These initial generational differences are illustrated early in the novel when Ona proposes to write a revolutionary manifesto. Greta savors the word “collectively,” while Mariche scoffs and accuses Ona of being a dreamer.

However, by coming together and speaking openly, honestly, and fearlessly, the women learn to act collectively to move toward a new life. As Salome—the last woman to join the departing line of buggies—says goodbye to August, their conversation captures the sense of unity the women have found with each other: “She began to climb down. We really have to hurry, she said. But you’re not fleeing, I said. You’re not rats running from a burning building. She laughed again. That’s right, she said. We’ve chosen to leave [emphasis added]” (207-08).

Keeping Faith in a Religion Steeped in Hypocrisy

One of the main challenges the characters in Women Talking face is how to have faith in a religion that promotes brutal patriarchy and reduces them to the status of property. While preaching love and forgiveness, their religious leader is anything but loving or forgiving, demanding that the women themselves forgive horrendous violations and accept their status as less than human. His ultimatum, based on the colony’s religious rules, is the subject of the women’s meetings: “If the women don’t forgive the men, says Peters, the women will have to leave the colony for the outside world, of which they know nothing” (5). During the women’s two days of deliberations, they challenge their community’s existing definitions of faith, forgiveness, and God.

Before and apart from the women’s meetings, the subject of faith and its complications arises in August’s conversation with the librarian who serves as his guide and advisor, pointing him back to the colony. She says, “[D]oubt and uncertainty and questioning are inextricably bound together with faith. A rich existence […] a way of being in the world, wouldn’t you say?” (12). This sets the stage for and foreshadows the conversations the women have as they decide to move toward this previously denied “rich existence.”

Early in the deliberations, Ona proposes the women write a manifesto that proclaims, among other things, “A new religion, extrapolated from the old but focused on love, will be created by the women of Molotschna” (56). While Greta and some of the women savor the idea of a world where men and women collectively make decisions and girls receive education alongside boys, Mariche is the voice of skepticism, calling Ona a dreamer. However, Agata points out the risks the women take if they continue to live under a religion that prevents them from being full human beings and accepts the violence they experience:

Our duty is to protect the creatures He has created, which is ourselves and our children, and to bear witness to our faith. Our faith requires of us absolute commitment to pacifism, love and forgiveness. By staying, we risk these things. We will be at war with our attackers because we’ve acknowledged that we—well, some of us—want to kill them. The only forgiveness we can offer if we stay would be coerced and not genuine. By leaving we will sooner achieve those things required of us by our faith—pacifism, love and forgiveness. And we will be teaching our children that these are our values. By leaving we will be teaching our children that they must pursue these values above and beyond the expectations of their fathers (110-11).

Ona likewise notes that some of them have lost their religion because of their experiences in the colony and must leave to live out their faith, and she implores the women: “[I]f we are to continue (or return to) being Good Mennonites, we must separate the men from the women until we can discover (or rediscover) our righteous path” (114).

The discussions over the next two days, however, soften Mariche’s skepticism and any doubt the women carry, and the women come together in their desire for a new religion and way of being faithful. Mariche, as the women prepare to leave the colony, emotionally repeats the description of the new religion they will create: “We want our children to be safe. She has begun to cry softly and is finding it difficult to speak, but she continues. We want to be steadfast in our faith. We want to think” (153). This clear vision supports the women as they move toward a new life, renewed faith, and a world in which they are treated as full human beings.